English Version
館藏查詢
他校館藏
  
   系統號碼942867
   書刊名Subversive performance in the age of human capital [electronic resource] /
   主要著者Kollectiv, Pil.
   其他著者Kollectiv, Galia.
   出版項Cham : Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, 2023.
   索書號N72.P6
   ISBN9783031358159
   標題Art-Political aspects.
Art and society.
Arts.
   電子資源https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35815-9
   
    
   分享▼ 
網站搜尋           

無紙本館藏記錄

內容簡介"This book sharply reveals the impotence of critical art in the face of neoliberalism, highlighting art workers' increasingly compromised role as agents of the very system of their own oppression. Importantly, the authors skilfully expand the scope for overidentification beyond its customary use of irony and performative excess, by demonstrating how such practices destabilise normative structures and exclusionary mechanisms. Through critical analyses of historical and contemporary artists' projects, this exciting and expansively researched book draws on political theory, post-Marxist critiques of labour, subculture studies and contemporary art theory, providing us with a measured optimism in the face of the demise of art's revolutionary potential." -Lina Džuverović, Curator and Lecturer in Arts Policy and Management, Birkbeck University "Pil and Galia Kollectiv expose the fake criticality of contemporary art, showing us how in many cases today's art declares itself as critical, whereas in reality it is only an official style (socialist realism) of neoliberalism." - Miran Mohar, member of IRWIN and New Collectivism Contemporary art relies on an expansionist, modernist ideal and still progresses through a critique of earlier forms of democratisation. But beneath this democratic drive, lurks a creeping crisis. Under neoliberalism, criticality has become a zone of value production. A self-deprecating irony, exposing and re-enacting this position of impotence, is one of the few gestures left in the arsenal of critical art. Against irony, this book pits overidentification. The term has been taken to mean a kind of parodic mimicry of institutional power. The authors differentiate this from bad faith flirting with taboo aesthetics by focusing on practices grounded in a genuine identification with power that ushers the kind of excess implied by overidentification. Staging forms of critique not so readily absorbed into the structure of the present, these subversive performa

讀者書評

尚無書評,


  
Copyright © 2007 元智大學(Yuan Ze University) ‧ 桃園縣中壢市 320 遠東路135號 ‧ (03)4638800